教育學院
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/1
教育學院成立於民國44年6月5日，時值臺灣省立師範學院改制為臺灣省立師範大學，初設教育、社會教育、體育衛生教育、家政教育、工業教育五個學系，發展迄今，本院共設有7個學系（均含學士、碩士及博士班）、5個獨立研究所、1個院級在職碩士專班。
本院為國內歷史最久之教育學院，系所規模、師資，及學生品質向為國內首屈一指，培育英才無數，畢業校友或擔任政府教育行政單位首長及中堅人才、或為大學校長及教育相關領域研究人員、或為國內中等教育師資之骨幹、或投入民間文教事業相關領域，皆為提升我國教育品質竭盡心力。此外，本學院長期深耕學術，研究領域多元，發行4本 TSSCI 期刊，學術聲望備受國內外學界肯定，根據 2015 年 QS 世界大學各學科排名結果，本校在教育學科名列第22名，不僅穩居臺灣第一，更躍居亞洲師範大學龍頭。
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item 健康促進學校與社區夥伴關係之現況及其相關因素研究(2010) 陳美嬿本研究為了解國民小學健康促進學校與社區夥伴關係之現況及其相關因素，以台北縣市各公、私立國民小學為研究母群體，依照學校規模分層比例隨機抽樣，共抽出230所學校，以自填結構式問卷由各校推動健康促進學校主要核心人員一人代表填答，共得有效問卷189份，有效回收率82.2%。主要研究結果發現如下： 一、在推動健康促進學校工作時，學校與醫療衛生院所的夥伴關係最好，次之為與家長、村里組織的夥伴關係，與公民營機關之夥伴關係最差。 二、在學校與社區建立夥伴關係的方式上，社區人士參與健康促進相關政策或計畫制定的比率最低；學校與社區共享資源種類以人力居多，依序為物力、財力資源；約五成學校與社區關係為非對等的夥伴關係；夥伴關係建立的困難最主要是學校課程活動緊湊，與他方配合的時間受限。 三、健康促進學校核心人員的個人因素及學校內、外部因素等相關因素，與社區夥伴關係現況五個面向(對象總數、關係建立方式的總分、共享資源總數、關係互動的總分、關係滿意度)皆有顯著相關之變項為家長參與意願、社區可運用的資源總數；與其中四個面向皆有顯著相關之變項為對社區的了解程度、主要推動人力數、學校同仁的了解程度、學校同仁的支持程度、社區領袖參與意願。 四、各相關因素對學校與社區夥伴關係五大面向的解釋變異量分別為49.7%、56.1%、43.5%、30.3%、35.9%。 根據研究結果，建議增加社區人士參與學校事務的機會，把健康促進活動納入學校年度行程，並建議教育、衛生機關設立獎勵辦法鼓勵學校人員參加健康促進研習活動，藉以提升其對健康促進學校的了解及支持程度，建置社區資源運用的資訊平台以增加其對社區的了解程度，如此有助於學校與社區夥伴關係的建立，將使健康促進工作推動更具成效。Item Using Organization Development Concept to Conduct Administrative Assessment of Health Promoting Schools in Taiwan- A Preliminary Study.(American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 2009-01-01) Jen-Jen Huang; Gwo-Liang Yeh; Chie-Chien Tseng; Wei William Chen; Yin-Jinn Hwu; Donald Dah-Shyong JiangThe Health Promoting School (HPS) programs in Taiwan were initiated and implemented with funding from Department of Health and Ministry of Education during the initial phase. The purpose of this article was to describe the application of organization development (OD) concept in the administrative assessment of HPS programs and to present results of administrative assessment specifically related to health promoting schools implementation. It is hoped that results from the study will provide useful information for decision making and policy implementation regarding health promoting schools in countries with similar situation. Questionnaire and face-to face interview were conducted based on the school organization development concept. Forty-eight schools from the Phase one health promoting schools were selected to participate in the survey. In addition, one school was selected for face-to face interview. The qualitative assessment included: (1) organization development structure responsible for the implementation of HPS, (2) personnel responsible for the implementation of HPS, (3) community participation, and (4) support and resources for the HPS. Twenty-seven health promoting schools responded to the electronic survey with response rate of 56.3%. Survey results showed that majority of the HPS projects were implemented by personnel within the existing school organization. Eighty-six percent (86%) of the schools had their health education teachers or school nurses implemented the HPS project. Majority of schools (86%) implemented the HPS project with participation of community groups. All schools indicated their HPS project was supported by school administrative organization. On the other hand, 76% of schools indicated they did not have enough time and manpower to carry out the HPS project. Organization development in schools could be a useful tool to assess the implementation of HPS. HPS in Taiwan showed good organization development structure to support their implementation. However, improvement in resource integration and closer partnership with local government and community could be helpful in resolving the problems of time constraints and manpower shortage.