「邏輯相關」和「適切相關」--中文資訊檢索系統評鑑量標初探

dc.contributor國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.author吳美美zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-03T01:30:46Z
dc.date.available2015-07-03T01:30:46Z
dc.date.issued1998-10-01
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the critical issues of relevance as one of the major evaluation criteria for information retrieval system. A pilot study was conducted to compare the so called "logical relevance" and "pertinence." The results suggest that logical relevance and pertinence indeed refer to different aspects and levels of information retrieval evaluation. Proper selection of the evaluation criteria based on the evaluation purposes and levels is recommended.en_US
dc.identifierntnulib_tp_A1203_01_017
dc.identifier.issn0363-3640
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/73365
dc.languagezh_TW
dc.publisher國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所zh_TW
dc.relation圖書館學與資訊科學,24(2),44-64。zh_TW
dc.subject.other檢索評鑑zh_TW
dc.subject.other檢索評鑑量標zh_TW
dc.subject.other相關zh_TW
dc.subject.otherInformation retrieval evaluationen_US
dc.subject.otherRelevanceen_US
dc.subject.otherLogical relevanceen_US
dc.subject.otherPertinenceen_US
dc.title「邏輯相關」和「適切相關」--中文資訊檢索系統評鑑量標初探zh_TW
dc.titleLogical Relevance V.S. Pertinence--In Search of Evaluation Criteria for CIR�en_US

Files

Collections