台灣公立美術館典藏政策與執行研究

Abstract

本論文探討與研究美術館的典藏政策包括：台北市立美術館、國立台灣美術館、高雄市立美術館、日本福岡亞洲美術館、韓國國立現代美術館、美國洛杉磯郡立美術館、芝加哥美術館及紐約大都會美術館。美術館博物館核心價值的彰顯，就在於美術館典藏品的豐富與否，典藏品本身就是知識的來源，可見典藏政策的關鍵性及重要性。 本論文主要以「文獻分析法」為主，除了對國內外之文獻資料加以整理、探討，還包括親自到美術館觀察、面談所獲得的資料，及公部門蒐藏藝術品的現況。而次級資料包括美術館出版的文獻、刊物及網路上所收集的資料。並運用美術館學者之研究成果與相關理論，加以歸納、分析和統整，整理出館與館間的關連模式、角色、原則與經驗，以做為國內美術館與相關單位進行相關工作時的參考與借鏡，並提出國內美術館典藏政策及定位重疊性嚴重、國內美術館典藏制度及法令僵化、國內美術館採購程序不透明、美術館/博物館應朝向法人化及企業化經營及催生博物館法之結論與建議。

This research work examines and studies the acquisition policy of art museums including Taipei Fine Arts Museum, National Taiwan Museum of Fine Arts, Kaohsiung Museum of Fine Arts, Fukuoka Asian Art Museum of Japan, Korean National Modern Museum of Arts, Los Angeles County Museum of Arts, Chicago Art Institute, and New York Metropolitan Museum of Arts. The prime value of an art museum lies in the richness and abundance of the acquired art work which is the source of knowledge. It is obvious that the acquisition policy becomes a very critical and important issue of an art museum.

Literature review and analysis were used as the principal tool of this research work. The literature of both domestic and foreign art museums were collected, examined and analyzed. In addition, visitation of art museums whenever and wherever possible was made personally. The museum personnel were interviewed and the first hand data were gathered and the status quo of the acquired art work of the museums was investigated. In addition, e-mail correspondence with foreign acquisition personnel was utilized to collect data to supplement the data pool. The secondary data include data gathered from the literature, periodicals and the web pages published by the museums. These data combining with the researchresult of museum scholars and the related theories were analyzed and deducted to find the related mode between the museums, the role, principle and experience of museums.

It is hoped that these results will be useful and helpful to the domestic art museums and related organization when the related policy and work were to be formulated and determined.

Several concluding remarks were presented as follows: the overlapping of the acquisition policy and the mission of public museums in Taiwan is very serious, the present laws and regulations governing the acquisition policy are very rigid and not flexible, and the acquisition procedures of domestic art museum are not transparent, the management of art museum should move toward legalization and enterprising direction. It is also hope that the specific laws governing the art museum be discussed and enacted soon.