Universal Constructions?

dc.contributor.authorAudrey Yen-hui Lien_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-27T15:40:04Z
dc.date.available2014-10-27T15:40:04Z
dc.date.issued2001-06-??zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe search for universal phrase structures leads to the question of whether specific constructions also share the same basic structures cross-linguistically --- “universal constructions.” Based on a comparative study of English and Chinese relative constructions, we argue that “universal construction” is not necessarily a valid notion. Kayne (1994)’s Antisymmetry to phrase structures forces a re-examination of relative structures: they must have a complementation structure, instead of the widely-accepted adjunction structure (Chomsky 1977). Evidence comes from important generalizations regarding the relations between the determiner heading a complex nominal and the relative clause. Kayne further argues that head-initial and head-final relatives are derived from the same basic structure, subscribing to the notion of “universal constructions.” We demonstrate, however, that head-final relatives in Chinese provide direct evidence for an adjunction structure, in contrast to English relatives, which convincingly support a complementation structure. The difference is traced to the different behavior of the determiner systems in these two types of languages.en_US
dc.identifierE13A0E5E-4057-9DC9-DF62-1FFA22C9CAC1zh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/23525
dc.language英文zh_TW
dc.publisher英語學系zh_tw
dc.publisherDepartment of English, NTNUen_US
dc.relation27(2),163-187zh_TW
dc.relation.ispartofConcentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguisticsen_US
dc.subject.otherRelativizationen_US
dc.subject.otherUniversal constructionsen_US
dc.subject.otherNominal structuresen_US
dc.subject.otherDetermineren_US
dc.subject.otherReconstructionen_US
dc.titleUniversal Constructions?zh-tw

Files