「邏輯相關」和「適切相關」—中文資訊檢索系統評鑑量標初探

dc.contributor.author吳美美zh_tw
dc.contributor.authorMei-Mei Wuen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-27T15:18:55Z
dc.date.available2014-10-27T15:18:55Z
dc.date.issued1998-10-??zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the critical issues of relevance as one of the major evaluation criteria for information retrieval system. A pilot study was conducted to compare the so called "logical relevance" and "pertinence." The results suggest that logical relevance and pertinence indeed refer to different aspects and levels of information retrieval evaluation. Proper selection of the evaluation criteria based on the evaluation purposes and levels is recommended.en_US
dc.identifier526C7CEB-B736-CD55-2C3F-AA64F499DF4Czh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/15245
dc.language中文zh_TW
dc.publisher國立台灣師範大學圖書資訊研究所zh_tw
dc.publisherGraduate Institute of Library and Information Studiesen_US
dc.relation24(2),44-64zh_TW
dc.relation.ispartof圖書館學與資訊科學zh_tw
dc.subject.other檢索評鑑zh_tw
dc.subject.other檢索評鑑量標zh_tw
dc.subject.other相關zh_tw
dc.subject.otherInformation retrieval evaluationen_US
dc.subject.otherRelevanceen_US
dc.subject.otherLogical relevanceen_US
dc.subject.otherPertinenceen_US
dc.title「邏輯相關」和「適切相關」—中文資訊檢索系統評鑑量標初探zh-tw
dc.title.alternativeLogical Relevance v.s. Pertinence—In Search of Evaluation Criteria for CIRzh_tw

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ntnulib_ja_A1201_2402_044.pdf
Size:
1.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format