哈特向的地理學方法論研究

dc.contributor.author池永歆zh_tw
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-27T15:40:15Z
dc.date.available2014-10-27T15:40:15Z
dc.date.issued2008-11-??zh_TW
dc.description.abstract哈特向的《地理學的性質》與其它方法論著作,在很大的程度上,係為反駁紹爾柏克萊學派的觀點而撰述。哈特向主要以赫特納的地理學觀點,作為其方法論的立論 依據。由本研究可看出:他係以改編的方式,而再現赫特納的觀點;其首要目的在於想經由德國地理學知性傳統的採納,確立地理學的學科屬性,而鞏固地理學在美 國學術中的地位。 哈特向於《地理學的性質》所採取的論述方式,即以地理學者曾說過什麼,而歸納這些主張的表面意義,實忽視這作法本身,絕無法展現他所欲達成之地理學的性質 或本質的闡明;亦即,本研究認為有關於此課題討論,須由地理學的存在論基礎的確認,方能闡釋地理學科的性質。zh_tw
dc.description.abstractRichard Hartshorne’s The Nature of Geography and his other works of geographical methodology were mostly designed as a response to the tradition of Carl Sauer’s Berkeley School. Hartshorne primarily took Hettner’s system of geography as a model to establish his methodological framework. But as this article shows, Hartshorne adapted Hettner’s viewpoint for his own end, and by this to lay the foundation for the discipline of geography among the sciences in America. In this article it also suggests that the understanding of geography’s ontology is the key to illuminate the nature of geography, rather than what Hartshorne has done in his methodological research.en_US
dc.identifier119AF42E-FE58-101C-8552-3C2574E5CE12zh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/23579
dc.language中文zh_TW
dc.publisher地理學系zh_tw
dc.publisherDepartment of Geography, NTNUen_US
dc.relation(49),41-60zh_TW
dc.relation.ispartof地理研究zh_tw
dc.subject.other哈特向zh_tw
dc.subject.other地理學的性質zh_tw
dc.subject.other赫特納zh_tw
dc.subject.other紹爾zh_tw
dc.subject.other地理學的方法論zh_tw
dc.subject.otherHartshorneen_US
dc.subject.otherThe nature of geographyen_US
dc.subject.otherHettneren_US
dc.subject.otherSaueren_US
dc.subject.otherGeographical methodologyen_US
dc.title哈特向的地理學方法論研究zh-tw
dc.title.alternativeHartshorne's Research on the Geographical Methodology: Retrospect and Examinationzh_tw

Files

Collections