大專運動員主動性人格與教練領導風格對運動表現及滿意度之預測

Abstract

本研究目的為 (1) 探討運動員主動性人格對於運動表現及運動員滿意度之預測情形；(2) 探討不同教練領導風格對於運動表現及運動員滿意度之預測情形；以及 (3) 探討運動員主動性人格與不同教練領導風格之交互作用效果，對於運動表現及運動員滿意度之預測情形。本研究採用問卷調查，研究參與者為大專甲組運動員，共計完成177 份有效問卷，其中男生96人，女生81人，平均年齡為20.37歲，標準差為1.47。經參與者同意後，分別填答主動性人格量表、自主支持教練領導風格量表、控制教練領導風格量表、自評運動表現量表以及滿意度量表。以皮爾遜積差相關與多元階層迴歸進行資料處理。研究結果發現：(1) 運動員主動性人格能正向的預測運動員表現及滿意度；(2) 自主支持教練領導風格能正向的預測運動員表現及滿意度，控制的教練領導風格則無預測效果；(3) 主動性人格與不同教練領導風格在預測運動員表現及滿意度上無交互作用效果。根據研究結果與討論，本研究針對實際應用與後續研究發展提出建議。The purpose of this study is to (1) examine the predictive situation of athletes' proactive personality for sports performance and athlete satisfaction; (2) examine the predictions of different coaches' leadership styles for sports performance and athlete satisfaction; and (3) examine the interaction effect between athletes' proactive personality and different coaching styles on sports performance and athlete satisfaction. Participants were 177 college student-athletes (male =96, female = 81). The average age was 20.37 years and the standard deviation was 1.47. After received the informed consent, all participants were asked to complete proactive personality scale, autonomy supporting coach leadership style scale, controlling coach leadership style scale, self-evaluation sports performance scale and satisfaction scale . Research data were analyzed by Pearson’s correlation and multiple hierarchical regression. The results showed that: (1) athletes' proactive personality can positively predict athlete performance and satisfaction; (2) autonomy supporting coaching leadership style can be positively predict athlete performance and satisfaction, and controlling coaching leadership style did not predictive effect (3) Proactive personality and different coach leadership styles have no interaction effect on predicting athlete performance and satisfaction. Based on the research results and discussion, this study proposes recommendations for practical application and subsequent research development.