大學入學制度參採高中學習歷程檔案：我國與美國加州大學系統的跨國比較
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021-06-??
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
國立臺灣師範大學師資培育與就業輔導處
Office of Teacher Education and Career Service
Office of Teacher Education and Career Service
Abstract
隨著「十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱課程」（又稱108課綱）於108年度正式實施，大學入學制度也有諸多重要變化，其中最受矚目為申請入學升學管道中，將學生個人於高中階段提交至高中學習歷程資料庫的檔案作為審查階段之備審資料。有別於考試分發僅以入學考試成績作為選才唯一標準，在申請入學管道中使用高中學習歷程檔案，旨在鼓勵高中端輔導學生儘早建立自主學習意識，同時敦促大學端建立專業化招生選才機制，進一步強化兩個教育階段之交流與合作。然而，由於國內多數教育工作者對於高中端如何善用高中學習歷程資料建立學生之生涯發展觀念，以及大學端如何運用進行選才之精神與方式缺乏足夠認識，致使於111學年度政策正式實施前，各方仍存有疑慮。本文以科技大學體系為例，介紹我國大學端使用高中學習歷程資料庫做為選才評選之作法，並與美國加州大學系統招生選才作業進行跨國比較，藉以加深國人對於參採高中學習歷程資料庫目的之了解，並對我國現行推動高中學習歷程資料庫措施給予建議。
Along with the initiative of a new senior high school curriculum framework in 2019, Taiwan higher education is experiencing a new round of college admission policy reform. The main change in this reform is the introduction of students' learning portfolios in the review process when the students submit their applications to universities. Different from the traditional test-based college entrance channel, the purpose of adopting the students' learning portfolio in the review process is to encourage students to build the sense of self-learning as well as helping the university's admission office to conduct professional review practices. However, there are still many misunderstandings against this new policy among the students, parents, and senior high school teachers. This paper aimed to narrow this gap by providing a thorough introduction to the new policy, followed by the introduction of the University of California system. The study further compared the similarities and differences between these two systems. The paper provided several suggestions in conclusion for both senior high schools and universities.
Along with the initiative of a new senior high school curriculum framework in 2019, Taiwan higher education is experiencing a new round of college admission policy reform. The main change in this reform is the introduction of students' learning portfolios in the review process when the students submit their applications to universities. Different from the traditional test-based college entrance channel, the purpose of adopting the students' learning portfolio in the review process is to encourage students to build the sense of self-learning as well as helping the university's admission office to conduct professional review practices. However, there are still many misunderstandings against this new policy among the students, parents, and senior high school teachers. This paper aimed to narrow this gap by providing a thorough introduction to the new policy, followed by the introduction of the University of California system. The study further compared the similarities and differences between these two systems. The paper provided several suggestions in conclusion for both senior high schools and universities.