校長專業發展之研究―指標建構
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2011-12-??
Authors
林煥民
鄭彩鳳
Huan-Min Lin
Tsai-Feng Cheng
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
國立台灣師範大學教育學系
Department od Education, NTNU
Department od Education, NTNU
Abstract
本研究旨在建構國中小校長專業發展指標，並將建構的指標轉化為問卷進行抽樣調查，以驗證分析指標具有良好之信、效度。本研究共分三階段進行：首先，整理校長專業發展理論及國內外10個模式文獻等，以形成指標初稿；其次，邀請8位專家進行焦點座談以修正指標，以及編製指標問卷草案並邀請9位專家建構內容效度；再進行預試與正式問卷施測，以分析考驗本指標。研究結果顯示，本研究之「國中小校長專業發展指標調查問卷」具有良好的信度與效度。最後，根據研究結果對教育單位與國中小校長提出具體建議。
The aim of this study was to construct professional development indicators for the principals of elementary and junior high schools and then test in the validity and reliability through a questionnaire. The process consisted of three stages. At first, the researcher reviewed a wide range of literature related to professional development to compile a list of ten patterns associated with the professional development of principals. Second, eight experts were assembled for a focus group to examine the indicators. Nine other experts evaluated the questionnaire for content validity before drafting a preliminary version of the questionnaire. Finally, the revised version was trial-tested and revised as the final version to test the indicators. The proposed questionnaire was found to have acceptable reliability and validity. A number of practical recommendations were made for administrators and principals of elementary and junior high schools.
The aim of this study was to construct professional development indicators for the principals of elementary and junior high schools and then test in the validity and reliability through a questionnaire. The process consisted of three stages. At first, the researcher reviewed a wide range of literature related to professional development to compile a list of ten patterns associated with the professional development of principals. Second, eight experts were assembled for a focus group to examine the indicators. Nine other experts evaluated the questionnaire for content validity before drafting a preliminary version of the questionnaire. Finally, the revised version was trial-tested and revised as the final version to test the indicators. The proposed questionnaire was found to have acceptable reliability and validity. A number of practical recommendations were made for administrators and principals of elementary and junior high schools.