從「現象學反思」到「意識型態批判」

Simple item page
dc.contributor.author王俊斌zh_tw
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-27T15:30:37Z
dc.date.available2014-10-27T15:30:37Z
dc.date.issued2002-09-??zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本文係以方法論的反省為著眼，就Edmund Husserl的「現象學反思」（phenomenological reflection）與Kral-Otto Apel所主張的「意識型態批判」（ideological critics）做為對比的焦點。基於方法對立性的凸顯，本文企圖一方面試著聚焦於「現象學反思」與「意識型態批判」在知識論與方法學上比較；另一方面則為期待透過這樣的對照，進而探索其在教育研究方法論反思上所孕含的意義。zh_tw
dc.description.abstractBased on methodological reflection foundation, the researcher compares the methodological standpoints between Edmund Husserl's“phenomenological reflection” and Kral-Otto Apel's“ideological critics” in this paper. The main purposes of this article are as follows: to explore the significance of methodological comparison and inquire its educational research implications.en_US
dc.identifier824AFBD7-5AF9-F6BF-DD53-8D757120D8FFzh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/19008
dc.language中文zh_TW
dc.publisher國立台灣師範大學教育學系zh_tw
dc.publisherDepartment od Education, NTNUen_US
dc.relation48(3)，35-69zh_TW
dc.relation.ispartof教育研究集刊zh_tw
dc.subject.other現象學反思zh_tw
dc.subject.other意識型態批判zh_tw
dc.subject.other教育學方法論zh_tw
dc.subject.otherPhenomenological reflectionen_US
dc.subject.otherIdeological criticsen_US
dc.subject.otherEducational methodologyen_US
dc.title從「現象學反思」到「意識型態批判」zh-tw
dc.title.alternativeFrom Phenomenological Reflections to Ideological Critics--Methodological Comparison between Husserl and Apel and Its Implications on Educational Researchzh_tw

Files

Collections

教育研究集刊