國中學生運動安全行為及其相關因素之研究─以北縣樹林高中國中部為例
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2004-12-01
Authors
畢莉莉
葉國樑
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
臺北市：中華民國學校衛生學會
Abstract
本研究主要目的在探討國中學生運動安全行為與其影響因素間的關係。研究母群體為九十二學年度臺北縣樹林市樹林高中國中部學生，採分層集束法進行抽樣，依年級分為三組共抽出14班，有效樣本 420 人。以自編之結構式問卷收集資料，重要結果歸納如下：一、研究對象的運動安全認知尚佳，但對於運動傷害後處理措施方面的認知較欠缺，有待加強。獲得運動安全的資訊來源，主要是由課堂、電視與廣播，及從老師、父母、同學朋友處獲得相關資訊。研究對象所擁有的運動安全資源屬中等以上；運動安全態度偏正向；運動安全社會支持也屬中等以上。研究對象的運動安全行為表現屬中等以上，只有在“我會在運動結束後，做緩和運動”這題上表現較差。二、“年級”、“父母社經地位” 與運動安全態度呈顯著差異。運動安全認知、運動安全資源與運動安全態度呈顯著的正相關。“年級”、“父母社經地位”、運動安全認知、運動安全資源能顯著預測運動安全態度，預測燮項共可解釋運動安全態度變異量的 35.77%。三、“年級”、“參與運動性社團”、“每次運動時間”與運動安全社會支持呈顯著差異。運動安全認知、運動安全資源運動安全社會支持呈顯著的正相關。“年級”、“參與運動性社圖”、“最常從事運動類型” 、“每次運動時間”、運動安全資源能顯著預測運動安全社會支持，預測變項共可解釋運動安全社會支持變具異量的 31.26%。四、運動安全態度、運動安全社會支持與運動安全行為呈現顯著正相關。運動安全態度、運動安全社會支持能顯著預測運動安全行為，對整體運動安全行為變異的解釋力達60.26%，其中又以運動安全態度對學生之運動安全行為的解釋力最大。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between safe sports' behavior and its influential factors of junior high students in Taipei county. By using a stratified cluster sampling method, 420 students were selected to participate in this survey. Data were collected by a self-administered questionnaire. The results of this research were as follows： 1. Most subjects had high cognition about safe sport, but the cognition about how to deal with sports' injury was still need to be strengthened. The subjects got the information of safe sport from class sources, TV, radio and from teachers, parents, classmates and friends. The subjects' resource of safe sport was within medium to high level. The' social support of safe sport was within medium to high level. The subjects' safe sports' behavior was in high level, only behavior in "after exercise, I do cool-down" was low. 2. Grade, parental socioeconomic status had obvious difference in attitude of safe sport. It had positive relations among the cognition of safe sport, the resource of safe sport, and the attitude of safe sport. Grade, parental socioeconomic status, the cognition of safe sport and the resources of safe sport were significant predictors of the attitude of safe sport. They could explain 35.77% variance of the attitude toward safe sport. 3. Grade, participation in exercise team, the period time of sport had obvious difference in social support of safe sport. It had positive relations among the cognition of safe sport, the resource of safe sport and the social support of safe sport. Grade, participation in exercise team, the resources of safe sport were significant predictors of social support of safe sport. They could explain 31.26% variance of social support of safe sport. 4. It had positive relations among the attitude of safe sport, the social support of safe sport, and the safe sports' behavior. The attitude of safe sport, social support of safe sport were significant predictors of safe sports' behavior. They could explain 60.26%variance of safe sports' behavior. The attitude of safe sport was the most important predictor of safe sports' behavior.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between safe sports' behavior and its influential factors of junior high students in Taipei county. By using a stratified cluster sampling method, 420 students were selected to participate in this survey. Data were collected by a self-administered questionnaire. The results of this research were as follows： 1. Most subjects had high cognition about safe sport, but the cognition about how to deal with sports' injury was still need to be strengthened. The subjects got the information of safe sport from class sources, TV, radio and from teachers, parents, classmates and friends. The subjects' resource of safe sport was within medium to high level. The' social support of safe sport was within medium to high level. The subjects' safe sports' behavior was in high level, only behavior in "after exercise, I do cool-down" was low. 2. Grade, parental socioeconomic status had obvious difference in attitude of safe sport. It had positive relations among the cognition of safe sport, the resource of safe sport, and the attitude of safe sport. Grade, parental socioeconomic status, the cognition of safe sport and the resources of safe sport were significant predictors of the attitude of safe sport. They could explain 35.77% variance of the attitude toward safe sport. 3. Grade, participation in exercise team, the period time of sport had obvious difference in social support of safe sport. It had positive relations among the cognition of safe sport, the resource of safe sport and the social support of safe sport. Grade, participation in exercise team, the resources of safe sport were significant predictors of social support of safe sport. They could explain 31.26% variance of social support of safe sport. 4. It had positive relations among the attitude of safe sport, the social support of safe sport, and the safe sports' behavior. The attitude of safe sport, social support of safe sport were significant predictors of safe sports' behavior. They could explain 60.26%variance of safe sports' behavior. The attitude of safe sport was the most important predictor of safe sports' behavior.