教師著作
Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/31271
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item 組織管理研究中測量工具的跨文化可輸出性(行政院國家科學委員會, 2009-12-31) 葉俶禎台灣的組織學者經常採用西方的研究量表作為研究的測量工具。本研究旨在探討 組織研究量表的跨文化可輸出性。主要是以測量恆等性的應用來調查實務上台灣組織研 究學者採用西方研究量表作為本土研究測量工具的有效性。首先建議針對近年來台灣 TSSCI 期刊中有關組織研究的文章進行一次大規模的文獻調查,以了解台灣學者對隱性 構念測量的建構方式,並對各項建構方式加以統計,以分辨出最常為台灣的組織學者直 接翻譯採用的西方研究量表。接下來針對這些量表檢測他們跨文化族群的測量恆等性, 以理解過去的研究是否有效,並確保未來使用這些量表時的信心。現有的統計分析程序 如結構方程式模型,以多組比較的確認性因素分析程序,可以用來作測量等值性的驗 證。樣本以台灣及量表發展的起源地的商業人士為對象。以欲檢測的量表作資料收集。 本研究希望達到下列目的: 1) 了解台灣的組織學者如何發展量表 2) 調查台灣的組織學者採用西方的研究量表作為研究工具的程度 3) 以台灣及量表發展的起源地的商業人士為對象收集資料,檢測最常為台灣的組 織學者所採用的量表的跨文化測量恆等性 4) 探討可能影響此類量表測量恆等性的因素 5) 增加台灣的組織學者對量表測量恆等性議題的認識 6) 提供台灣的組織學者在採用西方的研究量表作為研究工具時如何確保研究效度 的建議Item The Perceptions of Human Resource Development Professionals in Taiwan Regarding their Working Relationships with Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) during the Training Design Process.(Taylor & Francis, 2008-07-01) Lin, Y. C.; Jacobs, R. L.While the literature supports the importance of establishing a relationship between designers and subject matter experts (SMEs) in the training design process, this approach is not followed in all global practices. The purpose of this study was to identify the perceptions of human resource development professionals in Taiwan regarding their working relationships with SMEs. The respondents of the study were HRD professionals who worked in high-tech companies located in a science park in Taiwan. The study found that a significant relationship exists between the ability to work with SMEs and current ability in the training design process among HRD professionals who had worked with SMEs. This study provides implications for the professional development of HRD practitioners and HRD practice in Taiwan companies. Cross-cultural issues are discussed to explain inconsistencies between the results and US-based perspectives on the training design process.Item Business Ethics in Japan and Taiwan: Relativist and Utilitarian Perspectives(Taylor & Francis, 2008-10-01) Yvonne Stedham; Jeanne H. Yamamura; Chih-Chien LaiPerceptions of risk associated with an international investment decision are affected by the decision maker's understanding of ethical issues within a country. This study provides insights into the foundation for ethical judgments by investigating whether and how Japanese and Taiwanese graduate business students differ in assessing the ethical content of business scenarios. Considering cultural characteristics of the two countries, differences in ethical judgments were expected. The results show that when basing ethical judgments on relativistic and utilitarian criteria, the Japanese tend to judge the scenarios as significantly more unethical than the Taiwanese. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are presented.